The confusion here is far more conceptual than legal. Short answer: No. IDEA does not require that an “AT evaluation” or “AT assessment” be listed as a discrete item on a Permission to Evaluate (PTE) or Permission to Reevaluate (PTR) in every case. A district is not out of compliance simply because it uses a consultation-based, […]
At the SpedLawBlog North compound, we’re feeling generous and are sharing materials for those who teach special education law. For everyone else, the video listed as #5 below is well worth your time—at a minimum, watch that. In June 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in A.J.T. v. Osseo Area […]
For years, districts have debated whether virtual special education services could truly match the quality of in-person supports. After the chaos of 2020 and the patchwork solutions that followed, the field finally has what it lacked: evidence. Parallel Learning’s newly released 2024–2025 Outcomes Report puts numbers behind the question of whether virtual SDI […]
November 29, 1975 50 Years Ago Today Public Law 94-142, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, stands as one of the most consequential civil-rights laws in U.S. history, but its passage was neither inevitable nor uncontested. Before 1975, millions of children with disabilities were denied even the […]
When Congress passed the Education for All Handicapped Children Act in 1975, later renamed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), it marked one of the most transformative moments in American public education. For the first time, students with disabilities were guaranteed the right to a free appropriate public education (FAPE), and their parents were […]
David Bateman and Parallel Learning Announce Free Webinar: Navigating Uncertainty — A Washington Update for Special Education Leaders Date: October 21, 2025Time: 3:00–3:45 PM (ET) This 45-minute session will explore how special education providers can respond to major shifts at the U.S. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) during the […]
In October 2025, the U.S. Department of Education executed one of the most consequential reductions-in-force (RIF) in its history—466 positions eliminated, including nearly all staff from the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) and Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA). The Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS)—the federal backbone for IDEA oversight—was effectively dismantled […]
OverviewThe 2025–2026 Supreme Court term begins with a narrowed docket but potentially sweeping implications for K–12 education, particularly in civil rights, Title IX, and First Amendment jurisprudence. Following the end of Chevron deference, federal agencies—including the U.S. Department of Education—face weakened authority to interpret and enforce IDEA, Section 504, and […]
On Thursday, September 18, the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada allowed a class action lawsuit to go forward against the Clark County School District in Nevada and the Nevada State Department of Education. The suit was brought by 12 families of students with disabilities. The lawsuit alleged […]
CADRE (https://cadreworks.org) has released national IDEA dispute resolution (DR) data that offers a stark picture of both rising demand and mounting strain on state systems. While families are exercising their rights under IDEA at unprecedented levels, the numbers show states are struggling to keep pace. These are excellent summaries and […]
SPED LAW BLOG 